@article {692,
	title = {Pruning the polyphyletic genus Polyalthia (Annonaceae) and resurrecting the genus Monoon},
	journal = {Taxon},
	volume = {65},
	year = {2012},
	chapter = {1021-1039},
	url = {http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/iapt/tax/2012/00000061/00000005/art00009},
	author = {Xue, Bine and Su, Yvonne C. F. and Thomas, Daniel C. and Saunders, Richard M. K.}
}
@article {691,
	title = {Characterization of Hubera (Annonaceae), a new genus segregated from Polyalthia and allied to Miliusa},
	journal = {Phytotaxa},
	volume = {69},
	year = {2012},
	chapter = {33-56},
	keywords = {Malmeoideae, molecular systematics, Old World floristics, Paleotropics, palynology},
	url = {http://www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/content/2012/f/pt00069p056.pdf},
	author = {Chaowasku, Tanawat and Johnson, David M. and Van der Ham, R. W. J. M. and Chatrou, Lars W.}
}
@article {676,
	title = {Radiations and key innovations in an early branching angiosperm lineage (Annonaceae; Magnoliales)},
	journal = {Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society},
	volume = {169},
	number = {1},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {117-134},
	publisher = {Blackwell Publishing Ltd},
	abstract = {<p>Biologists are fascinated by species-rich groups and have attempted to discover the causes for their abundant diversification. Comprehension of the causes and mechanisms underpinning radiations and detection of their frequency will contribute greatly to the understanding of the evolutionary origin of biodiversity and its ecological structure. A dated and well-resolved phylogenetic tree of Annonaceae was used to study diversification patterns in the family in order to identify factors that drive speciation and the evolution of morphological (key) characters. It was found that, except for Goniothalamus, the largest genera in the family are not the result of radiations. Furthermore, the difference in species numbers between subfamilies Annonoideae (former long branch clade) and Malmeoideae (former short branch clade) cannot be attributed to significant differences in the diversification rate. Most of the speciation in Annonaceae is not distinguishable from a random branching process (i.e. chance), and no special explanations are therefore necessary for the distribution of species richness across the major part of the phylogenetic tree for Annonaceae. Only for a small number of clades can key innovations be invoked to explain the elevated rate of diversification.\&nbsp;\&copy; 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 169, 117\&ndash;134.</p>
},
	keywords = {adaptive radiation, rate shift, sister-group comparison, stochastic branching pattern, temporal method, topological method},
	isbn = {1095-8339},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2012.01223.x},
	author = {Erkens, Roy H. J. and Chatrou, Lars W. and Couvreur, Thomas L.P.}
}
@article {672,
	title = {Keys to the genera of Annonaceae},
	journal = {Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society},
	volume = {169},
	number = {1},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {74-83},
	publisher = {Blackwell Publishing Ltd},
	abstract = {Identification keys are provided for all genera currently recognized in Annonaceae. Separate keys are presented for the Neotropics (34 genera), Africa-Madagascar (40 genera) and Asia-Australasia (42 genera). These keys are based on a combination of vegetative and fertile characters.~{\textcopyright} 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 169, 74{\textendash}83.},
	keywords = {identification, synonymy, taxonomy},
	isbn = {1095-8339},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2012.01230.x},
	author = {Couvreur, Thomas L.P. and Maas, Paul J. M. and Meinke, Svenja and Johnson, David M. and Ke{\ss}Ler, Paul J. A.}
}
@article {673,
	title = {Macrophotographic wood atlas of Annonaceae},
	journal = {Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society},
	volume = {169},
	number = {1},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {135-189},
	publisher = {Blackwell Publishing Ltd},
	abstract = {In this article, a general description of the microscopic wood anatomy of Annonaceae is given. We provide a description of the wood anatomical features of the family and of all subfamilies and tribes, all from material in the Utrecht Wood collection. Hand-lens images can be an important help in identification, not only at the family level, but also at the level of genera or below, notwithstanding the fact that the number of characters that can be easily observed in end-grain photographs is restricted. The differences are often slight and difficult to summarize in a few words, making illustrations an indispensable tool. Therefore, we provide end-grain photographs of cross-sections of wood of 66 genera and >~90 species of Annonaceae. The variation seen in lens key characters is discussed against the framework of the current phylogenetic tree of the family. Additional remarks on microscopic features are given when appropriate.~{\textcopyright} 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 169, 135{\textendash}189.},
	keywords = {lens key characters, phylogenetic tree, wood anatomy},
	isbn = {1095-8339},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2012.01237.x},
	author = {Koek-Noorman, Jifke and Westra, Lubbert Y. T.}
}
@article {668,
	title = {The diversity and evolution of pollination systems in Annonaceae},
	journal = {Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society},
	volume = {169},
	number = {1},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {222-244},
	publisher = {Blackwell Publishing Ltd},
	abstract = {The pollination biology of Annonaceae has received considerable attention, with data now available for >~45\% of the genera (or genus-equivalent clades) included in recent molecular phylogenetic analyses. This provides a basis for understanding evolutionary shifts in the pollination system within the family. The present study focuses on subfamilies Anaxagoreoideae, Ambavioideae and Annonoideae, for which robust, well-resolved phylogenetic trees are available. Information is summarized on the pollination biology of individual clades and the evolutionary adaptations favouring different pollinator guilds evaluated. Although the majority of species of Annonaceae are pollinated by small beetles, five other pollinator groups are known: large beetles, thrips, flies, bees and cockroaches. Small-beetle pollination is inferred as the ancestral pollination system, with all other systems being derived. Evolutionary shifts to pollination by large beetles, thrips and flies are unlikely to have been significantly constrained by previous adaptations favouring pollination by small beetles, as many of the adaptations to these different pollinator guilds are similar (including protogyny, partially enclosed floral chambers and olfactory cues). In contrast, however, the evolutionary shift to bee pollination has presumably been constrained by both protogyny (as pollen-collecting bees are unlikely to visit pistillate-phase flowers) and the presence of floral chambers.~{\textcopyright} 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 169, 222{\textendash}244.},
	keywords = {cantharophily, pollination ecology, reproductive biology},
	isbn = {1095-8339},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2011.01208.x},
	author = {Saunders, Richard M. K.}
}
@article {669,
	title = {Evolution and phylogenetic significance of pollen in Annonaceae},
	journal = {Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society},
	volume = {169},
	number = {1},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {190-221},
	publisher = {Blackwell Publishing Ltd},
	abstract = {The remarkable diversity of pollen morphology in Annonaceae has attracted systematic attention since the 1970s. Optimization of pollen characters on a molecular tree confirms that granular monosulcate pollen, as in Anaxagorea and subfamily Ambavioideae, was ancestral in the family. However, granular structure is derived for angiosperms as a whole, and exine characters are highly homoplastic in Annonaceae. Because columellar taxa (Annickia, Bocageeae) diverged earlier than previously thought, columellae may have re-originated in the common ancestor of Malmeoideae and Annonoideae, which make up most of the family, with several later reversals to granular structure. In Malmeoideae, loss of the sulcus and origin of a verrucate tectum occurred in the tribe Miliuseae, followed by an uncertain number of origins of disulculate pollen. Tetrads arose several times in Annonoideae, but reverted to monads in Isolona and probably Uvarieae. Recognition that microspores rotate during development in Annona and Cymbopetalum suggests that the proximal thin area in these taxa is a modified distal sulcus, but rotation does not occur in all tetrad groups; a broader survey is needed to evaluate this phenomenon.~{\textcopyright} 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 169, 190{\textendash}221.},
	keywords = {angiosperms, Magnoliales, morphology, palynology, phylogeny, SYSTEMATICS},
	isbn = {1095-8339},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2012.01241.x},
	author = {Doyle, James A. and Le Thomas, Annick}
}
@article {670,
	title = {Floral scent in Annonaceae},
	journal = {Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society},
	volume = {169},
	number = {1},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {262-279},
	publisher = {Blackwell Publishing Ltd},
	abstract = {Many species of Annonaceae are known for their distinctive, penetrating floral aromas. Numerous pollination studies have documented floral scents which probably play a key role in specialized pollination strategies. In particular, floral scents appear to play crucial roles in deceptive pollination strategies, contributing to floral mimicry of ripe or decaying fruits, fungi and, potentially, carrion or faeces. Occasionally, floral scent may advertise genuine floral rewards, as is the case for two species of Unonopsis pollinated by male euglossine bees. To date, ten studies have chemically characterized floral scent for 24 species representing 11 genera of Annonaceae. In this review, I discuss the chemical composition and diversity of the analysed floral scents in Annonaceae. I also summarize and discuss a wide range of (human) perceptual descriptions of floral scent found throughout the literature on Annonaceae. I have framed discussions of floral scent in Annonaceae in ecological and evolutionary contexts whenever possible.~{\textcopyright} 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 169, 262{\textendash}279.},
	keywords = {basal angiosperm, floral odour, mimicry, pollination strategy, scent ecology, SPME},
	isbn = {1095-8339},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2012.01220.x},
	author = {Goodrich, Katherine R.}
}
@article {671,
	title = {How diverse are Annonaceae with regard to pollination?},
	journal = {Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society},
	volume = {169},
	number = {1},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {245-261},
	publisher = {Blackwell Publishing Ltd},
	abstract = {Studies during the last decades on representatives of Annonaceae have revealed their diversification with regard to pollination. Examples are given of species pollinated by beetles (cantharophily), which is the predominant mode of the majority of species worldwide, by small or large beetles (both groups having either diurnal or nocturnal flowers with or without thermogenesis), species pollinated by thrips (Thysanoptera), flies (myiophily and sapromyiophily), cockroaches and even bees (melittophily). Adaptational features of floral structures are compared with the behaviour of flower visitors, emphasizing floral rhythm, flower size, petal thickness, stamen structure and odour production. Anaxagorea, the earliest divergent surviving genus in Annonaceae, exhibits floral characters thought to be basal for the family: tissue-rich thick petals that form a pollination chamber; several Anaxagorea spp. exhibit thermogenesis, emit a fruit-like odour and attract small beetles as pollinators. As cantharophily is plesiomorphic in Anaxagorea and in Annonaceae, characters associated with beetle pollination appear imprinted in members of the whole family. Even non-cantharophilous species retain one or more characteristic features of beetle-pollinated species, such as thick petals, flattened and sclerified connective shields or protogynous dichogamy.~{\textcopyright} 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 169, 245{\textendash}261.},
	keywords = {Anaxagorea, cantharophily, cockroaches, flower structures, melittophily, myiophily, sapromyiophily, thermogenesis, thrips},
	isbn = {1095-8339},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2011.01209.x},
	author = {Gottsberger, Gerhard}
}
@article {667,
	title = {Dating clades with fossils and molecules: the case of Annonaceae},
	journal = {Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society},
	volume = {169},
	number = {1},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {84-116},
	publisher = {Blackwell Publishing Ltd},
	abstract = {This article addresses the challenges involved in estimating the ages of clades using fossils and DNA sequences. We review the principles and problems of placing fossils in trees of extant taxa and using them to constrain the ages of nodes in molecular dating analyses. Endressinia and Futabanthus provide minimum ages of 112~Mya for the stem lineage and 89~Mya for the crown group of Annonaceae, and the diversity of endosperm ruminations in seeds from the London Clay indicates that the four main clades of Annonaceae had diverged by 50~Mya. Ages inferred using these minimum constraints and a plastid phylogenetic tree for Annonaceae, particularly crown ages of the two main clades (Malmeoideae and Annonoideae), depend on assumptions regarding the pattern of variation in rates of molecular evolution. Our results using methods that assume rate autocorrelation or log-normal distribution of rates suggest that neither assumption fits well the apparently abrupt changes in rates in Annonaceae. Instead of soft-bounded age constraints, we argue for the use of only well-substantiated fossil evidence by means of priors with hard bounds. Thus, we can infer ages that take into account both palaeontological and phylogenetic uncertainty, without confounding the different factors involved.~{\textcopyright} 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 169, 84{\textendash}116.},
	keywords = {age constraints, BEAST, fossil calibration, Magnoliales, molecular dating, phylogeny, r8s, relaxed clock},
	isbn = {1095-8339},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2012.01234.x},
	author = {Michael D. Pirie and Doyle, James A.}
}
@article {666,
	title = {A concise bibliographic overview of Annonaceae},
	journal = {Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society},
	volume = {169},
	number = {1},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {41-73},
	publisher = {Blackwell Publishing Ltd},
	abstract = {It is important that taxonomic knowledge is disseminated by those who possess it. This can be carried out via online databases, printed publications or training in taxonomic practice. For Annonaceae, the online database AnnonBase includes all published names of Annonaceae at any rank worldwide. Recently, an updated index to genera, species and infraspecific taxa of Neotropical Annonaceae was published in hard copy. This manuscript contains a concise update to the Bibliography of Annonaceae published by the late E. A. Mennega in 1993. Since his publication, much work has been carried out on systematics and evolution of Annonaceae, with the advent of molecular phylogenetics providing an additional stimulus. Here, however, we concentrate only on taxonomic papers focusing specifically on the description and circumscription of taxa (e.g. revisions, monographs, floras, checklists, descriptions of new species or phylogenetic studies that show monophyly/polyphyly/paraphyly of genera). The index should provide an easy entrance into the most important taxonomic literature on Annonaceae from 1900 onwards for the trained and untrained taxonomist with an interest in Annonaceae.~{\textcopyright} 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 169, 41{\textendash}73.},
	keywords = {dissemination, outreach, taxonomic impediment, taxonomic literature},
	isbn = {1095-8339},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2012.01232.x},
	author = {Erkens, Roy H. J. and Mennega, Erik A. and Westra, Lubbert Y. Th}
}
